Assess whether past performance will score or be deemed not relevant (7d1746)
August 31, 2026
SITUATION Contracts officer supporting a bid in a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft has one working extract — contract-mod scope creep log — after a government estimate that is 30% below your floor. If contract-mod scope creep log cannot support past performance will score, the only defensible Government RFP output is hold.
DECISION Contracts officer supporting a bid in a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft must choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant using contract-mod scope creep log after a government estimate that is 30% below your floor.
HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Past performance will score now; contract-mod scope creep log already has the discriminator after a government estimate that is 30% below your floor. 2. Keep Be deemed not relevant in force until contract-mod scope creep log is completed after a government estimate that is 30% below your floor for contracts officer supporting a bid. 3. Treat contract-mod scope creep log as Past performance will score because both readings appear after a government estimate that is 30% below your floor. 4. Refuse a Government RFP close: contracts officer supporting a bid does not have the decision past performance will score turns on in contract-mod scope creep log.
ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Normalize pricing and exceptions against the solicitation that governs past performance will score. 2. Score competitive posture if contracts officer supporting a bid pursues, partners, or no-bids. 3. Test OCI, QASP, and mandatory evaluation rights a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft cannot waive quietly. 4. For this Government RFP Compliance and Cyber Requirements file, read contract-mod scope creep log against a government estimate that is 30% below your floor and write the one fact that would move past performance will score for contracts officer supporting a bid.
RECOMMENDATION Choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant on this Government RFP / Compliance and Cyber Requirements packet (contract-mod scope creep log after a government estimate that is 30% below your floor). The follow-on Compliance and Cyber Requirements action is what contracts officer supporting a bid does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.
COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Government RFP option on past performance will score, then the evidence in contract-mod scope creep log, then the action for contracts officer supporting a bid - Hypothesis scorecard against contract-mod scope creep log: supported / rejected / untestable - Named option among Past performance will score, Be deemed not relevant and the fact that kills the others - Owner and next date for contracts officer supporting a bid in a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft
Explore more
More Government RFP prompts
- Whether CMMC gaps are bid-killers or post-award plans from teaming agreement
- Whether CMMC gaps are bid-killers or post-award plans from shall-statement
- Assess whether CMMC gaps are bid-killers or post-award plans from OCI
- Assess whether to bid as prime, sub, or no-bid from discriminator table that
- Capture manager must resolve whether the SBIR data-rights assertions are too
Explore related decision areas
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

