Assess whether past performance will score or be deemed not relevant (ef9e5c)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
Capture and Pricing work in an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance now turns on past performance will score because a debrief that contradicts the evaluation-notice scores put contract-mod scope creep log in play. Contracts officer supporting a bid should say what contract-mod scope creep log proves.
Decision
Contracts officer supporting a bid in an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance must choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant using contract-mod scope creep log after a debrief that contradicts the evaluation-notice scores.
Hypotheses to test
- The population in contract-mod scope creep log is the one a debrief that contradicts the evaluation-notice scores named, so Past performance will score follows for this Capture and Pricing file.
- The population in contract-mod scope creep log is adjacent only to a debrief that contradicts the evaluation-notice scores; Be deemed not relevant is the honest Government RFP call.
- An incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance already contained a debrief that contradicts the evaluation-notice scores before contract-mod scope creep log arrived; no new Capture and Pricing path.
- Provenance on contract-mod scope creep log after a debrief that contradicts the evaluation-notice scores is broken; do not pick Past performance will score or Be deemed not relevant yet.
Analysis required
- Score competitive posture if contracts officer supporting a bid pursues, partners, or no-bids.
- Test OCI, QASP, and mandatory evaluation rights an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance cannot waive quietly.
- Map Section L/M requirements in contract-mod scope creep log to evaluator notes after a debrief that contradicts the evaluation-notice scores.
- For this Government RFP Capture and Pricing file, read contract-mod scope creep log against a debrief that contradicts the evaluation-notice scores and write the one fact that would move past performance will score for contracts officer supporting a bid.
Recommendation
Choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant on this Government RFP / Capture and Pricing packet (contract-mod scope creep log after a debrief that contradicts the evaluation-notice scores). The follow-on Capture and Pricing action is what contracts officer supporting a bid does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.
Explore more
More Government RFP prompts
- Assess whether the teaming structure creates OCI or workshare risk (f6645d)
- Assess whether the teaming structure creates OCI or workshare risk (ec1774)
- Assess whether to bid as prime, sub, or no-bid (25331d)
- Assess whether Section M scoring math was applied consistently (5ea0c8)
- Assess whether claimed differentiators would survive a fact check (2ecb3c)
Explore related decision areas
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

