Assess whether past performance will score or be deemed not relevant (71dde4)

Situation

A data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year put contract-mod scope creep log in front of CMMC implementation lead in a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft. This Government RFP / Protest and Modifications close is past performance will score from contract-mod scope creep log, and the live options are Past performance will score, Be deemed not relevant.

Decision

CMMC implementation lead in a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft must choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant using contract-mod scope creep log after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year.

Hypotheses to test

• Contract-mod scope creep log reads as Past performance will score once a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year is lined up to the same Government RFP population.
• Contract-mod scope creep log is closer to Be deemed not relevant after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year; Past performance will score would over-claim this Protest and Modifications extract.
• A dual reading is still live in contract-mod scope creep log for CMMC implementation lead in a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft.
• Contract-mod scope creep log is missing the fact CMMC implementation lead needs after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year; stop this Government RFP close.

Analysis required

• Test OCI, QASP, and mandatory evaluation rights a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft cannot waive quietly.
• Map Section L/M requirements in contract-mod scope creep log to evaluator notes after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year.
• Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what contract-mod scope creep log attaches.
• For this Government RFP Protest and Modifications file, read contract-mod scope creep log against a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year and write the one fact that would move past performance will score for CMMC implementation lead.

Recommendation

Choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant on this Government RFP / Protest and Modifications packet (contract-mod scope creep log after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year). The follow-on Protest and Modifications action is what CMMC implementation lead does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.