Assess whether past performance will score or be deemed not relevant (a4d05f)

Situation

Capture manager owns past performance will score inside an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance with key-personnel resume vs. solicitation qualifications as the only packet. A data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year is what changed the clock for this Government RFP Performance and Teaming file.

Decision

Capture manager in an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance must choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant using key-personnel resume vs. solicitation qualifications after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year — specific to key-personnel resume vs. solicitation qualifications after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year on this Government RFP Performance and Teaming file for capture manager in an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance.

Hypotheses to test

• Capture manager can defend Past performance will score from key-personnel resume vs. solicitation qualifications after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year in a Government RFP challenge.
• Capture manager cannot defend Past performance will score from key-personnel resume vs. solicitation qualifications; Be deemed not relevant is what the extract actually supports after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year.
• A data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year never reached the population in key-personnel resume vs. solicitation qualifications — reopen intake, do not close past performance will score.
• Two facts in key-personnel resume vs. solicitation qualifications after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year conflict for capture manager; hold this Performance and Teaming file.

Analysis required

• Test OCI, QASP, and mandatory evaluation rights an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance cannot waive quietly.
• Map Section L/M requirements in key-personnel resume vs. solicitation qualifications to evaluator notes after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year.
• Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what key-personnel resume vs. solicitation qualifications attaches.
• For this Government RFP Performance and Teaming file, read key-personnel resume vs. solicitation qualifications against a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year and write the one fact that would move past performance will score for capture manager.