Assess whether past performance will score or be deemed not relevant (8d62ae)

SITUATION After a subcontracting goal the supply base cannot hit, shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps is what contracts officer supporting a bid can touch in a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft. Government RFP will live with Past performance will score versus Be deemed not relevant on this Compliance and Cyber Requirements file.

DECISION Contracts officer supporting a bid in a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft must choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant using shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps after a subcontracting goal the supply base cannot hit.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. The population in shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps is the one a subcontracting goal the supply base cannot hit named, so Past performance will score follows for this Compliance and Cyber Requirements file. 2. The population in shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps is adjacent only to a subcontracting goal the supply base cannot hit; Be deemed not relevant is the honest Government RFP call. 3. A joint venture with an uneven workshare draft already contained a subcontracting goal the supply base cannot hit before shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps arrived; no new Compliance and Cyber Requirements path. 4. Provenance on shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps after a subcontracting goal the supply base cannot hit is broken; do not pick Past performance will score or Be deemed not relevant yet.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Test OCI, QASP, and mandatory evaluation rights a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft cannot waive quietly. 2. Map Section L/M requirements in shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps to evaluator notes after a subcontracting goal the supply base cannot hit. 3. Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps attaches. 4. For this Government RFP Compliance and Cyber Requirements file, read shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps against a subcontracting goal the supply base cannot hit and write the one fact that would move past performance will score for contracts officer supporting a bid.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant on this Government RFP / Compliance and Cyber Requirements packet (shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps after a subcontracting goal the supply base cannot hit). The follow-on Compliance and Cyber Requirements action is what contracts officer supporting a bid does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Government RFP option on past performance will score, then the evidence in shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps, then the action for contracts officer supporting a bid - Hypothesis scorecard against shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps: supported / rejected / untestable - Compliance and Cyber Requirements finding in shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps that a second reviewer can re-perform - Missing page in shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps after a subcontracting goal the supply base cannot hit, if any