Assess whether procurement should fail a vendor lacking eval rights (5fb8d2)

SITUATION Post-deployment monitoring owner is responsible for procurement should fail a in an enterprise that just bought an AI 'control plane' vendor, using content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy as the only working extract. A committee that has not met since the last incident is what reset the timeline for this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file.

DECISION Post-deployment monitoring owner in an enterprise that just bought an AI 'control plane' vendor must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy after a committee that has not met since the last incident.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. The population in content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy is the one a committee that has not met since the last incident named, so Policy or governance breach follows for this Lifecycle and Accountability file. 2. The population in content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy is adjacent only to a committee that has not met since the last incident; Model defect is the honest AI Governance Layer call. 3. An enterprise that just bought an AI 'control plane' vendor already contained a committee that has not met since the last incident before content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy arrived; no new Lifecycle and Accountability path. 4. Provenance on content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy after a committee that has not met since the last incident is broken; do not pick Policy or governance breach or Model defect yet.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Map the control-plane score in content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy to the policy gate post-deployment monitoring owner can enforce. 2. Name the override that would let procurement should fail a proceed without a silent bypass. 3. Test whether a committee that has not met since the last incident changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy against a committee that has not met since the last incident and write the one fact that would move procurement should fail a for post-deployment monitoring owner.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy after a committee that has not met since the last incident). The follow-on Lifecycle and Accountability action is what post-deployment monitoring owner does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.