Assess whether procurement should fail a vendor lacking eval rights (4b017b)

SITUATION A manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA cannot treat a committee that has not met since the last incident as incidental context on agent permissioning that allows external side effects. AI committee secretariat must close procurement should fail a from that extract under AI Governance Layer / Audit and Vendor Terms.

DECISION AI committee secretariat in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using agent permissioning that allows external side effects after a committee that has not met since the last incident.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. A committee that has not met since the last incident is noise around an already-controlled Audit and Vendor Terms process in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA, given agent permissioning that allows external side effects. 2. A committee that has not met since the last incident is the event in agent permissioning that allows external side effects that forces Policy or governance breach for AI committee secretariat under AI Governance Layer. 3. Agent permissioning that allows external side effects shows a one-file miss after a committee that has not met since the last incident, not a Audit and Vendor Terms program failure. 4. Agent permissioning that allows external side effects cannot decide procurement should fail a yet after a committee that has not met since the last incident; hold is the only AI Governance Layer close a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA can defend.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Score whether the agent action in agent permissioning that allows external side effects was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 2. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA. 3. Map the control-plane score in agent permissioning that allows external side effects to the policy gate AI committee secretariat can enforce. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file, read agent permissioning that allows external side effects against a committee that has not met since the last incident and write the one fact that would move procurement should fail a for AI committee secretariat.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Audit and Vendor Terms packet (agent permissioning that allows external side effects after a committee that has not met since the last incident). The follow-on Audit and Vendor Terms action is what AI committee secretariat does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.