Assess whether a protest is rational after debrief (581735)

Situation

After a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year, past-performance recency and relevance scorecard is what past-performance volume owner can touch in a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft. Government RFP will live with Pursue versus Pursue with conditions on this Performance and Teaming file.

Decision

Past-performance volume owner in a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft must choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid using past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year.

Hypotheses to test

• The population in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard is the one a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year named, so Pursue follows for this Performance and Teaming file.
• The population in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard is adjacent only to a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year; Pursue with conditions is the honest Government RFP call.
• A joint venture with an uneven workshare draft already contained a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year before past-performance recency and relevance scorecard arrived; no new Performance and Teaming path.
• Provenance on past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year is broken; do not pick Pursue or Pursue with conditions yet.

Analysis required

• Map Section L/M requirements in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard to evaluator notes after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year.
• Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what past-performance recency and relevance scorecard attaches.
• Normalize pricing and exceptions against the solicitation that governs a protest is rational.
• For this Government RFP Performance and Teaming file, read past-performance recency and relevance scorecard against a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year and write the one fact that would move a protest is rational for past-performance volume owner.

Recommendation

Choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid on this Government RFP / Performance and Teaming packet (past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year). Lead with the Government RFP option past-performance recency and relevance scorecard can support after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for past-performance volume owner in a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft.