Assess whether a protest is rational after debrief (30f807)

Situation

An incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance cannot treat a government estimate that is 30% below your floor as color commentary on teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes. Past-performance volume owner must close a protest is rational from that extract under Government RFP / Protest and Modifications.

Decision

Past-performance volume owner in an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance must choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid using teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes after a government estimate that is 30% below your floor.

Hypotheses to test

• Authorize Pursue now; teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes already has the discriminator after a government estimate that is 30% below your floor.
• Keep Pursue with conditions in force until teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes is completed after a government estimate that is 30% below your floor for past-performance volume owner.
• Treat teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes as Partner because both readings appear after a government estimate that is 30% below your floor.
• Refuse a Government RFP close: past-performance volume owner does not have the page a protest is rational turns on in teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes.

Analysis required

• Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes attaches.
• Normalize pricing and exceptions against the solicitation that governs a protest is rational.
• Score competitive posture if past-performance volume owner pursues, partners, or no-bids.
• For this Government RFP Protest and Modifications file, read teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes against a government estimate that is 30% below your floor and write the one fact that would move a protest is rational for past-performance volume owner.

Recommendation

Choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid on this Government RFP / Protest and Modifications packet (teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes after a government estimate that is 30% below your floor). If teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes cannot force a Government RFP label under Protest and Modifications, stop. If teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes after a government estimate that is 30% below your floor cannot support Pursue versus Pursue with conditions on this Government RFP Protest and Modifications close, past-performance volume owner must identify the Section L/M or evaluation criterion that remains unproven rather than filling the gap.