Assess whether a referral to counsel is warranted (636c53)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
A tax-authority information document request put ghost-employee payroll extract in front of litigation-support partner in a pre-IPO SaaS company drafting an S-1. This Forensic Accounting / Occupational Fraud close is a referral to counsel is warranted from ghost-employee payroll extract, and the live options are Remove access or reverse the item, Temporary compensating control, Approve a documented exception.
Decision
Litigation-support partner in a pre-IPO SaaS company drafting an S-1 must choose Remove access or reverse the item / Temporary compensating control / Approve a documented exception / Hold using ghost-employee payroll extract after a tax-authority information document request.
Hypotheses to test
- Authorize Remove access or reverse the item now; ghost-employee payroll extract already has the discriminator after a tax-authority information document request.
- Keep Temporary compensating control in force until ghost-employee payroll extract is completed after a tax-authority information document request for litigation-support partner.
- Treat ghost-employee payroll extract as Approve a documented exception because both readings appear after a tax-authority information document request.
- Refuse a Forensic Accounting close: litigation-support partner does not have the page a referral to counsel is warranted turns on in ghost-employee payroll extract.
Analysis required
- Reconstruct vendor, journal, or inventory lines in ghost-employee payroll extract through the window opened by a tax-authority information document request.
- Trace approval, SoD, and related-party links that ghost-employee payroll extract actually shows.
- Test cutoff, reversals, and system-of-record ties for materiality on a referral to counsel is warranted.
- For this Forensic Accounting Occupational Fraud file, read ghost-employee payroll extract against a tax-authority information document request and write the one fact that would move a referral to counsel is warranted for litigation-support partner.
Recommendation
Choose Remove access or reverse the item / Temporary compensating control / Approve a documented exception / Hold on this Forensic Accounting / Occupational Fraud packet (ghost-employee payroll extract after a tax-authority information document request). The follow-on Occupational Fraud action is what litigation-support partner does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.
Explore more
More Forensic Accounting prompts
- Assess whether bonus triggers were gamed by cutoff after a PE
- Revenue-integrity director must resolve whether SAB 99 qualitative
- Assess whether SAB 99 qualitative materiality is triggered (9d4865)
- Assess whether a referral to counsel is warranted (ce0c0d)
- Assess whether a control deficiency is significant or material (1bc93b)
Explore related decision areas
- Assess whether to re-trade, restructure, or drop (127c4e)M&A Due Diligence
- Assess whether loss development requires a rate or a restriction (f77f80)Insurance Underwriting
- IP diligence counsel's financial counterpart must resolve whether a topM&A Due Diligence
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

