Assess whether the result is a refusal, a negative dilute, or a recollect

SITUATION Medical review officer in a company transitioning to oral fluid has one working extract — hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision — after an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff. If hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision cannot support the result is a, the only defensible Forensic Drug Testing output is hold.

DECISION Medical review officer in a company transitioning to oral fluid must choose The result is a refusal, a negative dilute, / A recollect using hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision after an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. An oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff is noise around an already-controlled Program Design and Audit process in a company transitioning to oral fluid, given hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision. 2. An oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff is the event in hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision that forces The result is a refusal, a negative dilute, for medical review officer under Forensic Drug Testing. 3. Hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision shows a one-file miss after an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff, not a Program Design and Audit program failure. 4. Hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision cannot decide the result is a yet after an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff; hold is the only Forensic Drug Testing close a company transitioning to oral fluid can defend.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Test whether a broken seal, timing miss, or donor explanation changes the result is a. 2. Confirm the kit ID in hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision matches the collection log. 3. Check MRO notes and cutoffs against the protocol a company transitioning to oral fluid claims to run. 4. For this Forensic Drug Testing Program Design and Audit file, read hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision against an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff and write the one fact that would move the result is a for medical review officer.

RECOMMENDATION Choose The result is a refusal, a negative dilute, / A recollect on this Forensic Drug Testing / Program Design and Audit packet (hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision after an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff). Lead with the Forensic Drug Testing option hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision can support after an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for medical review officer in a company transitioning to oral fluid.