Assess whether the result is a refusal, a negative dilute, or a recollect

SITUATION A return-to-duty file with incomplete follow-up tests cannot treat a donor claiming the seal was already broken as incidental context on return-to-duty follow-up testing calendar. Return-to-duty coordinator must close the result is a from that extract under Forensic Drug Testing / Program Design and Audit.

DECISION Return-to-duty coordinator in a return-to-duty file with incomplete follow-up tests must choose The result is a refusal, a negative dilute, / A recollect using return-to-duty follow-up testing calendar after a donor claiming the seal was already broken.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. The population in return-to-duty follow-up testing calendar is the one a donor claiming the seal was already broken named, so The result is a refusal, a negative dilute, follows for this Program Design and Audit file. 2. The population in return-to-duty follow-up testing calendar is adjacent only to a donor claiming the seal was already broken; A recollect is the honest Forensic Drug Testing call. 3. A return-to-duty file with incomplete follow-up tests already contained a donor claiming the seal was already broken before return-to-duty follow-up testing calendar arrived; no new Program Design and Audit path. 4. Provenance on return-to-duty follow-up testing calendar after a donor claiming the seal was already broken is broken; do not pick The result is a refusal, a negative dilute, or A recollect yet.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Check MRO notes and cutoffs against the protocol a return-to-duty file with incomplete follow-up tests claims to run. 2. Walk chain of custody, collection site, and validity flags in return-to-duty follow-up testing calendar after a donor claiming the seal was already broken. 3. Name the step return-to-duty coordinator cannot reconstruct from return-to-duty follow-up testing calendar. 4. For this Forensic Drug Testing Program Design and Audit file, read return-to-duty follow-up testing calendar against a donor claiming the seal was already broken and write the one fact that would move the result is a for return-to-duty coordinator.

RECOMMENDATION Choose The result is a refusal, a negative dilute, / A recollect on this Forensic Drug Testing / Program Design and Audit packet (return-to-duty follow-up testing calendar after a donor claiming the seal was already broken). The follow-on Program Design and Audit action is what return-to-duty coordinator does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Forensic Drug Testing option on the result is a, then the evidence in return-to-duty follow-up testing calendar, then the action for return-to-duty coordinator - Hypothesis scorecard against return-to-duty follow-up testing calendar: supported / rejected / untestable - Owner and next date for return-to-duty coordinator in a return-to-duty file with incomplete follow-up tests - What changes the result is a if a donor claiming the seal was already broken is later withdrawn