Assess whether an RFP gap is correctable or a recompete risk (3fe122)

Situation

The desk packet is purchase-request split just under the SAT after an OCC request for model validation of a fair-lending control. Federal AI-procurement reviewer in a bank in a fair-lending comparative-file exam has to name An RFP gap is correctable or A recompete risk for this US Federal Banking Regulation and Model Risk file.

Decision

Federal AI-procurement reviewer in a bank in a fair-lending comparative-file exam must choose An RFP gap is correctable / A recompete risk using purchase-request split just under the SAT after an OCC request for model validation of a fair-lending control.

Hypotheses to test

• The population in purchase-request split just under the SAT is the one an OCC request for model validation of a fair-lending control named, so An RFP gap is correctable follows for this Banking Regulation and Model Risk file.
• The population in purchase-request split just under the SAT is adjacent only to an OCC request for model validation of a fair-lending control; A recompete risk is the honest US Federal call.
• A bank in a fair-lending comparative-file exam already contained an OCC request for model validation of a fair-lending control before purchase-request split just under the SAT arrived; no new Banking Regulation and Model Risk path.
• Provenance on purchase-request split just under the SAT after an OCC request for model validation of a fair-lending control is broken; do not pick An RFP gap is correctable or A recompete risk yet.

Analysis required

• Normalize pricing and CPARS/QASP evidence that actually supports an RFP gap is.
• Compare PTW and compliance gates in purchase-request split just under the SAT to a pursue / partner / no-bid split.
• Test OCI and SAM.gov status before a bank in a fair-lending comparative-file exam commits.
• For this US Federal Banking Regulation and Model Risk file, read purchase-request split just under the SAT against an OCC request for model validation of a fair-lending control and write the one fact that would move an RFP gap is for federal AI-procurement reviewer.

Recommendation

Choose An RFP gap is correctable / A recompete risk on this US Federal / Banking Regulation and Model Risk packet (purchase-request split just under the SAT after an OCC request for model validation of a fair-lending control). Lead with the US Federal option purchase-request split just under the SAT can support after an OCC request for model validation of a fair-lending control, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for federal AI-procurement reviewer in a bank in a fair-lending comparative-file exam.