Whether Section M scoring math was applied consistently from past-performance

Situation

CMMC implementation lead owns Section M scoring math inside an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance with past-performance recency and relevance scorecard as the only packet. An incumbent protest rumor on the street is what changed the clock for this Government RFP Compliance and Cyber Requirements file.

Decision

CMMC implementation lead in an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance must choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid using past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after an incumbent protest rumor on the street.

Hypotheses to test

• The population in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard is the one an incumbent protest rumor on the street named, so Pursue follows for this Compliance and Cyber Requirements file.
• The population in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard is adjacent only to an incumbent protest rumor on the street; Pursue with conditions is the honest Government RFP call.
• An incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance already contained an incumbent protest rumor on the street before past-performance recency and relevance scorecard arrived; no new Compliance and Cyber Requirements path.
• Provenance on past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after an incumbent protest rumor on the street is broken; do not pick Pursue or Pursue with conditions yet.

Analysis required

• Map Section L/M requirements in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard to evaluator notes after an incumbent protest rumor on the street.
• Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what past-performance recency and relevance scorecard attaches.
• Normalize pricing and exceptions against the solicitation that governs Section M scoring math.
• For this Government RFP Compliance and Cyber Requirements file, read past-performance recency and relevance scorecard against an incumbent protest rumor on the street and write the one fact that would move Section M scoring math for CMMC implementation lead.

Recommendation

Choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid on this Government RFP / Compliance and Cyber Requirements packet (past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after an incumbent protest rumor on the street). Lead with the Government RFP option past-performance recency and relevance scorecard can support after an incumbent protest rumor on the street, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for CMMC implementation lead in an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance.