Assess whether Section M scoring math was applied consistently (776b86)

Situation

Protest-risk counsel's technical counterpart owns Section M scoring math inside a contractor evaluating a modification that looks like out-of-scope work with past-performance recency and relevance scorecard as the only packet. A government estimate that is 30% below your floor is what changed the clock for this Government RFP Protest and Modifications file.

Decision

Protest-risk counsel's technical counterpart in a contractor evaluating a modification that looks like out-of-scope work must choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid using past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a government estimate that is 30% below your floor.

Hypotheses to test

• A government estimate that is 30% below your floor is noise around an already-controlled Protest and Modifications process in a contractor evaluating a modification that looks like out-of-scope work, given past-performance recency and relevance scorecard.
• A government estimate that is 30% below your floor is the event in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard that forces Pursue for protest-risk counsel's technical counterpart under Government RFP.
• Past-performance recency and relevance scorecard shows a one-file miss after a government estimate that is 30% below your floor, not a Protest and Modifications program failure.
• Past-performance recency and relevance scorecard cannot decide Section M scoring math yet after a government estimate that is 30% below your floor; hold is the only Government RFP close a contractor evaluating a modification that looks like out-of-scope work can defend.

Analysis required

• Map Section L/M requirements in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard to evaluator notes after a government estimate that is 30% below your floor.
• Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what past-performance recency and relevance scorecard attaches.
• Normalize pricing and exceptions against the solicitation that governs Section M scoring math.
• For this Government RFP Protest and Modifications file, read past-performance recency and relevance scorecard against a government estimate that is 30% below your floor and write the one fact that would move Section M scoring math for protest-risk counsel's technical counterpart.

Recommendation