Assess whether a shadow system must be decommissioned this quarter (9d8bbb)

Situation

A board deck that called the system 'fully explainable' put agentic-workflow permission matrix in front of model-risk officer in a pharma company using LLMs on trial documents. This AI Governance / Vendors and Agentic Systems close is a shadow system must from agentic-workflow permission matrix, and the live options are Policy or governance breach, Model defect, Dual failure.

Decision

Model-risk officer in a pharma company using LLMs on trial documents must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using agentic-workflow permission matrix after a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable'.

Hypotheses to test

• The population in agentic-workflow permission matrix is the one a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable' named, so Policy or governance breach follows for this Vendors and Agentic Systems file.
• The population in agentic-workflow permission matrix is adjacent only to a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable'; Model defect is the honest AI Governance call.
• A pharma company using LLMs on trial documents already contained a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable' before agentic-workflow permission matrix arrived; no new Vendors and Agentic Systems path.
• Provenance on agentic-workflow permission matrix after a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable' is broken; do not pick Policy or governance breach or Model defect yet.

Analysis required

• Reproduce the incident row in agentic-workflow permission matrix and say whether it ever touched production data.
• Split policy-or-governance failure from a model defect using prompts, outputs, and human edits in agentic-workflow permission matrix.
• Reproduce the incident row in agentic-workflow permission matrix and say whether it ever touched production data.
• For this AI Governance Vendors and Agentic Systems file, read agentic-workflow permission matrix against a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable' and write the one fact that would move a shadow system must for model-risk officer.

Recommendation

Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Vendors and Agentic Systems packet (agentic-workflow permission matrix after a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable'). Lead with the AI Governance option agentic-workflow permission matrix can support after a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable', then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for model-risk officer in a pharma company using LLMs on trial documents.