Assess whether a shadow system must be decommissioned this quarter (fdd697)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
Inventory and Regulatory Fit work in a city using a hiring-screen algorithm now turns on a shadow system must because a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable' put explainability pack for a denied-credit decision in play. HR analytics governance lead should say what explainability pack for a denied-credit decision proves.
Decision
HR analytics governance lead in a city using a hiring-screen algorithm must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using explainability pack for a denied-credit decision after a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable'.
Hypotheses to test
- Explainability pack for a denied-credit decision reads as Policy or governance breach once a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable' is lined up to the same AI Governance population.
- Explainability pack for a denied-credit decision is closer to Model defect after a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable'; Policy or governance breach would over-claim this Inventory and Regulatory Fit extract.
- Dual failure is still live in explainability pack for a denied-credit decision for HR analytics governance lead in a city using a hiring-screen algorithm.
- Explainability pack for a denied-credit decision is missing the fact HR analytics governance lead needs after a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable'; stop this AI Governance close.
Analysis required
- Map the approved-use case to the system a shadow system must would bind.
- Check intended purpose and inventory status against EU AI Act / exam-readiness language after a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable'.
- Map the approved-use case to the system a shadow system must would bind.
- For this AI Governance Inventory and Regulatory Fit file, read explainability pack for a denied-credit decision against a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable' and write the one fact that would move a shadow system must for HR analytics governance lead.
Recommendation
Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Inventory and Regulatory Fit packet (explainability pack for a denied-credit decision after a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable'). The follow-on Inventory and Regulatory Fit action is what HR analytics governance lead does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.
Explore more
More AI Governance prompts
- Assess whether a generative-AI incident is a policy breach or a model defect
- Assess whether deprecation of a legacy scorecard creates a governance gap
- May the Agent Take Actions Without a Human Gate?
- Privacy counsel supporting AI inventory must resolve whether the vendor can
- Assess whether training data has a lawful basis and documented lineage
Explore related decision areas
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

