Assess whether a shadow system must be decommissioned this quarter (8facab)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
Privacy counsel supporting AI inventory owns a shadow system must inside a pharma company using LLMs on trial documents with EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet as the only packet. A new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose is what changed the clock for this AI Governance Policy and Oversight file.
Decision
Privacy counsel supporting AI inventory in a pharma company using LLMs on trial documents must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose.
Hypotheses to test
- Authorize Policy or governance breach now; EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet already has the discriminator after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose.
- Keep Model defect in force until EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet is completed after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose for privacy counsel supporting AI inventory.
- Treat EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet as Dual failure because both readings appear after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose.
- Refuse a AI Governance close: privacy counsel supporting AI inventory does not have the page a shadow system must turns on in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet.
Analysis required
- Split policy-or-governance failure from a model defect using prompts, outputs, and human edits in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet.
- Reproduce the incident row in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet and say whether it ever touched production data.
- Split policy-or-governance failure from a model defect using prompts, outputs, and human edits in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet.
- For this AI Governance Policy and Oversight file, read EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet against a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose and write the one fact that would move a shadow system must for privacy counsel supporting AI inventory.
Recommendation
Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Policy and Oversight packet (EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose). The follow-on Policy and Oversight action is what privacy counsel supporting AI inventory does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.
Explore more
More AI Governance prompts
- Assess whether the vendor can be used in a regulated process (fa59ba)
- Assess whether a generative-AI incident is a policy breach or a model defect
- Assess whether explainability artifacts would survive an exam (3971f1)
- Assess whether the board has been accurately briefed (78adb8)
- Assess whether an agent may take actions without a human gate (6a1134)
Explore related decision areas
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

