Assess whether the system is high-risk under the EU AI Act after a near-miss
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
Inventory and Regulatory Fit work in a manufacturer piloting shop-floor copilot tools now turns on the system is high-risk because a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed put agentic-workflow permission matrix in play. Board AI liaison should say what agentic-workflow permission matrix proves.
Decision
Board AI liaison in a manufacturer piloting shop-floor copilot tools must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using agentic-workflow permission matrix after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed.
Hypotheses to test
- Authorize Policy or governance breach now; agentic-workflow permission matrix already has the discriminator after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed.
- Keep Model defect in force until agentic-workflow permission matrix is completed after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed for board AI liaison.
- Treat agentic-workflow permission matrix as Dual failure because both readings appear after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed.
- Refuse a AI Governance close: board AI liaison does not have the page the system is high-risk turns on in agentic-workflow permission matrix.
Analysis required
- Map the approved-use case to the system the system is high-risk would bind.
- Check intended purpose and inventory status against EU AI Act / exam-readiness language after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed.
- Map the approved-use case to the system the system is high-risk would bind.
- For this AI Governance Inventory and Regulatory Fit file, read agentic-workflow permission matrix against a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed and write the one fact that would move the system is high-risk for board AI liaison.
Recommendation
Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Inventory and Regulatory Fit packet (agentic-workflow permission matrix after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed). The follow-on Inventory and Regulatory Fit action is what board AI liaison does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.
Explore more
More AI Governance prompts
- Vendor-diligence reviewer for AI tools must resolve whether human review
- Assess whether the system is high-risk under the EU AI Act after a new use
- Whether the vendor can be used in a regulated process from vendor model card
- Assess whether the board has been accurately briefed from generative-AI
- Vendor-diligence reviewer for AI tools must resolve whether a generative-AI
Explore related decision areas
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

