Assess whether the system is high-risk under the EU AI Act (691774)

SITUATION A university licensing an AI proctoring vendor cannot treat a business unit that already went live without a risk tier as incidental context on board literacy briefing deck with overstated claims. Exam-readiness coordinator must close the system is high-risk from that extract under AI Governance / Vendors and Agentic Systems.

DECISION Exam-readiness coordinator in a university licensing an AI proctoring vendor must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using board literacy briefing deck with overstated claims after a business unit that already went live without a risk tier.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. A business unit that already went live without a risk tier is noise around an already-controlled Vendors and Agentic Systems process in a university licensing an AI proctoring vendor, given board literacy briefing deck with overstated claims. 2. A business unit that already went live without a risk tier is the event in board literacy briefing deck with overstated claims that forces Policy or governance breach for exam-readiness coordinator under AI Governance. 3. Board literacy briefing deck with overstated claims shows a one-file miss after a business unit that already went live without a risk tier, not a Vendors and Agentic Systems program failure. 4. Board literacy briefing deck with overstated claims cannot decide the system is high-risk yet after a business unit that already went live without a risk tier; hold is the only AI Governance close a university licensing an AI proctoring vendor can defend.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Map the approved-use case to the system the system is high-risk would bind. 2. Check intended purpose and inventory status against EU AI Act / exam-readiness language after a business unit that already went live without a risk tier. 3. Map the approved-use case to the system the system is high-risk would bind. 4. For this AI Governance Vendors and Agentic Systems file, read board literacy briefing deck with overstated claims against a business unit that already went live without a risk tier and write the one fact that would move the system is high-risk for exam-readiness coordinator.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Vendors and Agentic Systems packet (board literacy briefing deck with overstated claims after a business unit that already went live without a risk tier). Lead with the AI Governance option board literacy briefing deck with overstated claims can support after a business unit that already went live without a risk tier, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for exam-readiness coordinator in a university licensing an AI proctoring vendor.