Assess whether the system is high-risk under the EU AI Act (9ee66b)

SITUATION EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet arrived with a journalist asking if the hiring tool is biased. EU AI Act implementation manager in a hospital deploying a sepsis-risk model still has an evidence gap on whether the system is high-risk under the EU AI Act.

DECISION EU AI Act implementation manager in a hospital deploying a sepsis-risk model must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after a journalist asking if the hiring tool is biased.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Policy or governance breach now; EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet already has the discriminator after a journalist asking if the hiring tool is biased. 2. Keep Model defect in force until EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet is completed after a journalist asking if the hiring tool is biased for EU AI Act implementation manager. 3. Treat EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet as Dual failure because both readings appear after a journalist asking if the hiring tool is biased. 4. Refuse a AI Governance close: EU AI Act implementation manager does not have the decision the system is high-risk turns on in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Walk the model input/output path recorded in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged. 2. Verify data provenance and the human-oversight gate EU AI Act implementation manager can actually point to. 3. Walk the model input/output path recorded in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged. 4. For this AI Governance Vendors and Agentic Systems file, read EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet against a journalist asking if the hiring tool is biased and write the one fact that would move the system is high-risk for EU AI Act implementation manager.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Vendors and Agentic Systems packet (EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after a journalist asking if the hiring tool is biased). The follow-on Vendors and Agentic Systems action is what EU AI Act implementation manager does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line AI Governance option on the system is high-risk, then the evidence in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet, then the action for EU AI Act implementation manager - Hypothesis scorecard against EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet: supported / rejected / untestable - Missing page in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after a journalist asking if the hiring tool is biased, if any - Regulatory or exam hook Vendors and Agentic Systems would cite