Assess whether the system is high-risk under the EU AI Act (cdab62)

SITUATION A DPA inquiry about training on European user data put EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet in front of board AI liaison in a bank preparing for a model-risk exam. This AI Governance / Vendors and Agentic Systems decision is the system is high-risk from EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet, and the live options are Policy or governance breach, Model defect, Dual failure.

DECISION Board AI liaison in a bank preparing for a model-risk exam must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after a DPA inquiry about training on European user data.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Board AI liaison can defend Policy or governance breach from EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after a DPA inquiry about training on European user data in a AI Governance challenge. 2. Board AI liaison cannot defend Policy or governance breach from EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet; Model defect is what the extract actually supports after a DPA inquiry about training on European user data. 3. A DPA inquiry about training on European user data never reached the population in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet — reopen intake, do not close the system is high-risk. 4. Two facts in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after a DPA inquiry about training on European user data conflict for board AI liaison; hold this Vendors and Agentic Systems file.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Walk the model input/output path recorded in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged. 2. Verify data provenance and the human-oversight gate board AI liaison can actually point to. 3. Walk the model input/output path recorded in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged. 4. For this AI Governance Vendors and Agentic Systems file, read EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet against a DPA inquiry about training on European user data and write the one fact that would move the system is high-risk for board AI liaison.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Vendors and Agentic Systems packet (EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after a DPA inquiry about training on European user data). The follow-on Vendors and Agentic Systems action is what board AI liaison does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line AI Governance option on the system is high-risk, then the evidence in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet, then the action for board AI liaison - Hypothesis scorecard against EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet: supported / rejected / untestable - Regulatory or exam hook Vendors and Agentic Systems would cite - Vendors and Agentic Systems finding in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet that a second reviewer can re-perform