Assess whether the system is high-risk under the EU AI Act (20c9bf)

SITUATION Board AI liaison is responsible for the system is high-risk in a retailer using generative AI in customer service, using explainability pack for a denied-credit decision as the only working extract. A business unit that already went live without a risk tier is what reset the timeline for this AI Governance Policy and Oversight file.

DECISION Board AI liaison in a retailer using generative AI in customer service must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using explainability pack for a denied-credit decision after a business unit that already went live without a risk tier.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Policy or governance breach now; explainability pack for a denied-credit decision already has the discriminator after a business unit that already went live without a risk tier. 2. Keep Model defect in force until explainability pack for a denied-credit decision is completed after a business unit that already went live without a risk tier for board AI liaison. 3. Treat explainability pack for a denied-credit decision as Dual failure because both readings appear after a business unit that already went live without a risk tier. 4. Refuse a AI Governance close: board AI liaison does not have the decision the system is high-risk turns on in explainability pack for a denied-credit decision.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Check intended purpose and inventory status against EU AI Act / exam-readiness language after a business unit that already went live without a risk tier. 2. Map the approved-use case to the system the system is high-risk would bind. 3. Check intended purpose and inventory status against EU AI Act / exam-readiness language after a business unit that already went live without a risk tier. 4. For this AI Governance Policy and Oversight file, read explainability pack for a denied-credit decision against a business unit that already went live without a risk tier and write the one fact that would move the system is high-risk for board AI liaison.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Policy and Oversight packet (explainability pack for a denied-credit decision after a business unit that already went live without a risk tier). If explainability pack for a denied-credit decision cannot force a AI Governance label under Policy and Oversight, stop. If explainability pack for a denied-credit decision after a business unit that already went live without a risk tier cannot support Policy or governance breach versus Model defect on this AI Governance Policy and Oversight close, board AI liaison must leave the classification unresolved and name the missing control or provenance fact.