Assess whether the system is high-risk under the EU AI Act (e7dd9f)

SITUATION Explainability pack for a denied-credit decision arrived with a journalist asking if the hiring tool is biased. Board AI liaison in a retailer using generative AI in customer service still has an evidence gap on whether the system is high-risk under the EU AI Act.

DECISION Board AI liaison in a retailer using generative AI in customer service must choose Policy or governance breach, Model defect, Dual failure, Hold for the missing fact using explainability pack for a denied-credit decision after a journalist asking if the hiring tool is biased. The question on that file is whether the system is high-risk under the EU AI Act.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Policy or governance breach now; explainability pack for a denied-credit decision already has the discriminator after a journalist asking if the hiring tool is biased. 2. Keep Model defect in force until explainability pack for a denied-credit decision is completed after a journalist asking if the hiring tool is biased for board AI liaison. 3. Treat explainability pack for a denied-credit decision as Dual failure because both readings appear after a journalist asking if the hiring tool is biased. 4. Refuse a AI Governance close: board AI liaison does not have the decision the system is high-risk turns on in explainability pack for a denied-credit decision.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Walk the model input/output path recorded in explainability pack for a denied-credit decision and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged. 2. Verify data provenance and the human-oversight gate board AI liaison can actually point to. 3. Walk the model input/output path recorded in explainability pack for a denied-credit decision and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged. 4. For this AI Governance Policy and Oversight file, read explainability pack for a denied-credit decision against a journalist asking if the hiring tool is biased and write the one fact that would move the system is high-risk for board AI liaison.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Policy and Oversight packet (explainability pack for a denied-credit decision after a journalist asking if the hiring tool is biased). If explainability pack for a denied-credit decision cannot force a AI Governance label under Policy and Oversight, stop. If explainability pack for a denied-credit decision after a journalist asking if the hiring tool is biased cannot support Policy or governance breach versus Model defect on this AI Governance Policy and Oversight close, board AI liaison must leave the classification unresolved and name the missing control or provenance fact.