Board AI liaison must resolve whether the system is high-risk under the EU AI
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
Board AI liaison owns the system is high-risk inside a manufacturer piloting shop-floor copilot tools with incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo as the only packet. A journalist asking if the hiring tool is biased is what changed the clock for this AI Governance Inventory and Regulatory Fit file.
Decision
Board AI liaison in a manufacturer piloting shop-floor copilot tools must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo after a journalist asking if the hiring tool is biased.
Hypotheses to test
- Authorize Policy or governance breach now; incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo already has the discriminator after a journalist asking if the hiring tool is biased.
- Keep Model defect in force until incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo is completed after a journalist asking if the hiring tool is biased for board AI liaison.
- Treat incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo as Dual failure because both readings appear after a journalist asking if the hiring tool is biased.
- Refuse a AI Governance close: board AI liaison does not have the page the system is high-risk turns on in incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo.
Analysis required
- Walk the model input/output path recorded in incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged.
- Verify data provenance and the human-oversight gate board AI liaison can actually point to.
- Walk the model input/output path recorded in incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged.
- For this AI Governance Inventory and Regulatory Fit file, read incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo against a journalist asking if the hiring tool is biased and write the one fact that would move the system is high-risk for board AI liaison.
Recommendation
Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Inventory and Regulatory Fit packet (incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo after a journalist asking if the hiring tool is biased). The follow-on Inventory and Regulatory Fit action is what board AI liaison does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.
Explore more
More AI Governance prompts
- Assess whether explainability artifacts would survive an exam (5bb0d6)
- Whether human review is real or a rubber stamp from explainability pack
- Whether the vendor can be used in a regulated process from incomplete model
- Whether the inventory can be represented to an examiner as complete
- EU AI Act implementation manager must resolve whether the system is high-risk
Explore related decision areas
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

