Assess whether TDP is complete enough to compete the work (b90c47)
August 31, 2026
SITUATION Depot Procurement Intelligence work in a workload that shifted from organic repair to contract now turns on TDP is complete enough because a OEM end-of-life notice with 90 days of stock put scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN in play. Obsolescence and DMSMS analyst should say what scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN proves.
DECISION Obsolescence and DMSMS analyst in a workload that shifted from organic repair to contract must choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold using scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN after a OEM end-of-life notice with 90 days of stock.
HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Fund and move materiel now; scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN already has the discriminator after a OEM end-of-life notice with 90 days of stock. 2. Keep Cannibalize or substitute in force until scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN is completed after a OEM end-of-life notice with 90 days of stock for obsolescence and DMSMS analyst. 3. Treat scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN as Defer a cycle because both readings appear after a OEM end-of-life notice with 90 days of stock. 4. Refuse a Defense Sustainment close: obsolescence and DMSMS analyst does not have the decision TDP is complete enough turns on in scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN.
ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Quantify mission impact if TDP is complete enough is deferred one cycle in a workload that shifted from organic repair to contract. 2. Reconcile depot demand in scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN to fleet readiness and NSN coverage after a OEM end-of-life notice with 90 days of stock. 3. Trace the funding or cannibalization line that would actually move scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN. 4. For this Defense Sustainment Depot Procurement Intelligence file, read scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN against a OEM end-of-life notice with 90 days of stock and write the one fact that would move TDP is complete enough for obsolescence and DMSMS analyst.
RECOMMENDATION A workload that shifted from organic repair to contract needs a named owner on TDP is complete enough. Assign obsolescence and DMSMS analyst to execute Fund and move materiel when scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN after a OEM end-of-life notice with 90 days of stock is complete, or Cannibalize or substitute when the Depot Procurement Intelligence packet still lacks the discriminator in scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN.
COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Defense Sustainment option on TDP is complete enough, then the evidence in scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN, then the action for obsolescence and DMSMS analyst - Hypothesis scorecard against scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN: supported / rejected / untestable - What changes TDP is complete enough if a OEM end-of-life notice with 90 days of stock is later withdrawn - Named option among Fund and move materiel, Cannibalize or substitute, Defer a cycle and the fact that kills the others
Explore more
More Defense Sustainment prompts
- Assess whether an alternate source is technically qualified (6ca118)
- Assess whether an alternate source is technically qualified (a73a19)
- Whether a DMSMS hit is already a stock-out risk from BOM that still lists
- Assess whether a cancelled spec is still being bought as if current (e88507)
- Sustainment contracting specialist must resolve whether to repair
Explore related decision areas
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

