Assess whether to bid as prime, sub, or no-bid from past-performance recency

SITUATION Past-performance recency and relevance scorecard arrived with a key person who just resigned for contracts officer supporting a bid. That is a Government RFP Compliance and Cyber Requirements decision on to bid as prime, sub, or no-bid in a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft.

DECISION Contracts officer supporting a bid in a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft must choose To bid as prime, sub, / No-bid using past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a key person who just resigned.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize To bid as prime, sub, now; past-performance recency and relevance scorecard already has the discriminator after a key person who just resigned. 2. Keep No-bid in force until past-performance recency and relevance scorecard is completed after a key person who just resigned for contracts officer supporting a bid. 3. Treat past-performance recency and relevance scorecard as To bid as prime, sub, because both readings appear after a key person who just resigned. 4. Refuse a Government RFP close: contracts officer supporting a bid does not have the decision to bid as prime, sub, or no-bid turns on in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Test OCI, QASP, and mandatory evaluation rights a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft cannot waive quietly. 2. Map Section L/M requirements in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard to evaluator notes after a key person who just resigned. 3. Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what past-performance recency and relevance scorecard attaches. 4. For this Government RFP Compliance and Cyber Requirements file, read past-performance recency and relevance scorecard against a key person who just resigned and write the one fact that would move to bid as prime, sub, or no-bid for contracts officer supporting a bid.

RECOMMENDATION Choose To bid as prime, sub, / No-bid on this Government RFP / Compliance and Cyber Requirements packet (past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a key person who just resigned). Lead with the Government RFP option past-performance recency and relevance scorecard can support after a key person who just resigned, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for contracts officer supporting a bid in a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Government RFP option on to bid as prime, sub, or no-bid, then the evidence in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard, then the action for contracts officer supporting a bid - Hypothesis scorecard against past-performance recency and relevance scorecard: supported / rejected / untestable - Named option among To bid as prime, sub,, No-bid and the fact that kills the others - Owner and next date for contracts officer supporting a bid in a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft