Assess whether to price to win or walk from a buy-in (5f96d8)

SITUATION In a new prime parsing a 400-page Section L/M, a key person who just resigned put past-performance recency and relevance scorecard in play. Price-to-win analyst should decide whether to price to win or walk from a buy-in without filling gaps past-performance recency and relevance scorecard does not contain.

DECISION Price-to-win analyst in a new prime parsing a 400-page Section L/M must choose To price to win / Walk from a buy-in using past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a key person who just resigned.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Price-to-win analyst can defend To price to win from past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a key person who just resigned in a Government RFP challenge. 2. Price-to-win analyst cannot defend To price to win from past-performance recency and relevance scorecard; Walk from a buy-in is what the extract actually supports after a key person who just resigned. 3. A key person who just resigned never reached the population in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard — reopen intake, do not close to price to win or walk. 4. Two facts in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a key person who just resigned conflict for price-to-win analyst; hold this Performance and Teaming file.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Score competitive posture if price-to-win analyst pursues, partners, or no-bids. 2. Test OCI, QASP, and mandatory evaluation rights a new prime parsing a 400-page Section L/M cannot waive quietly. 3. Map Section L/M requirements in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard to evaluator notes after a key person who just resigned. 4. For this Government RFP Performance and Teaming file, read past-performance recency and relevance scorecard against a key person who just resigned and write the one fact that would move to price to win or walk for price-to-win analyst.

RECOMMENDATION Choose To price to win / Walk from a buy-in on this Government RFP / Performance and Teaming packet (past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a key person who just resigned). The follow-on Performance and Teaming action is what price-to-win analyst does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Government RFP option on to price to win or walk, then the evidence in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard, then the action for price-to-win analyst - Hypothesis scorecard against past-performance recency and relevance scorecard: supported / rejected / untestable - Performance and Teaming finding in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard that a second reviewer can re-perform - Missing page in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a key person who just resigned, if any