Assess whether to price to win or walk from a buy-in (be5c8f)

SITUATION An OCI letter naming an affiliate you forgot to firewall put past-performance recency and relevance scorecard in front of past-performance volume owner in an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance. This Government RFP / Protest and Modifications close is to price to win or walk from past-performance recency and relevance scorecard, and the live options are To price to win, Walk from a buy-in.

DECISION Past-performance volume owner in an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance must choose To price to win / Walk from a buy-in using past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after an OCI letter naming an affiliate you forgot to firewall.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize To price to win now; past-performance recency and relevance scorecard already has the discriminator after an OCI letter naming an affiliate you forgot to firewall. 2. Keep Walk from a buy-in in force until past-performance recency and relevance scorecard is completed after an OCI letter naming an affiliate you forgot to firewall for past-performance volume owner. 3. Treat past-performance recency and relevance scorecard as To price to win because both readings appear after an OCI letter naming an affiliate you forgot to firewall. 4. Refuse a Government RFP close: past-performance volume owner does not have the decision to price to win or walk turns on in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Score competitive posture if past-performance volume owner pursues, partners, or no-bids. 2. Test OCI, QASP, and mandatory evaluation rights an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance cannot waive quietly. 3. Map Section L/M requirements in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard to evaluator notes after an OCI letter naming an affiliate you forgot to firewall. 4. For this Government RFP Protest and Modifications file, read past-performance recency and relevance scorecard against an OCI letter naming an affiliate you forgot to firewall and write the one fact that would move to price to win or walk for past-performance volume owner.

RECOMMENDATION Choose To price to win / Walk from a buy-in on this Government RFP / Protest and Modifications packet (past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after an OCI letter naming an affiliate you forgot to firewall). The follow-on Protest and Modifications action is what past-performance volume owner does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Government RFP option on to price to win or walk, then the evidence in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard, then the action for past-performance volume owner - Hypothesis scorecard against past-performance recency and relevance scorecard: supported / rejected / untestable - Named option among To price to win, Walk from a buy-in and the fact that kills the others - Owner and next date for past-performance volume owner in an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance