Assess whether to re-trade, restructure, or drop (ff1ea6)

SITUATION Integration-risk PMO owns this Separation and Integration review in a health-system acquiring a specialty practice. IT diligence showing two ERPs and no chart of accounts map is the triggering event; customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses is the evidence for whether to re-trade, restructure, or drop.

DECISION Integration-risk PMO in a health-system acquiring a specialty practice must choose To re-trade, restructure, / Drop using customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses after IT diligence showing two ERPs and no chart of accounts map.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize To re-trade, restructure, now; customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses already has the discriminator after IT diligence showing two ERPs and no chart of accounts map. 2. Keep Drop in force until customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses is completed after IT diligence showing two ERPs and no chart of accounts map for integration-risk PMO. 3. Treat customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses as To re-trade, restructure, because both readings appear after IT diligence showing two ERPs and no chart of accounts map. 4. Refuse a M&A Due Diligence close: integration-risk PMO does not have the decision to re-trade, restructure, or drop turns on in customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Separate a one-off add-back from a recurring earnings issue in customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses. 2. Map reps, earnout mechanics, and integration risk a health-system acquiring a specialty practice would inherit. 3. Tie quality-of-earnings, working-capital, and contingent items in customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses to to re-trade, restructure, or drop. 4. For this M&A Due Diligence Separation and Integration file, read customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses against IT diligence showing two ERPs and no chart of accounts map and write the one fact that would move to re-trade, restructure, or drop for integration-risk PMO.

RECOMMENDATION Choose To re-trade, restructure, / Drop on this M&A Due Diligence / Separation and Integration packet (customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses after IT diligence showing two ERPs and no chart of accounts map). Lead with the M&A Due Diligence option customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses can support after IT diligence showing two ERPs and no chart of accounts map, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for integration-risk PMO in a health-system acquiring a specialty practice.