Assess whether to recoup, waive, or refer for prosecution (f4b2fc)

SITUATION Housing-subsidy fraud investigator is responsible for to recoup, waive, or refer in a state SNAP agency after an EBT skimming wave, using legislative briefing on error-rate drivers as the only working extract. A CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE is what reset the timeline for this Public Benefits Compliance and Integrity Operations file.

DECISION Housing-subsidy fraud investigator in a state SNAP agency after an EBT skimming wave must choose To recoup, waive, / Refer for prosecution using legislative briefing on error-rate drivers after a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Legislative briefing on error-rate drivers reads as To recoup, waive, once a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE is lined up to the same Public Benefits population. 2. Legislative briefing on error-rate drivers is closer to Refer for prosecution after a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE; To recoup, waive, would over-claim this Compliance and Integrity Operations extract. 3. A dual reading is still live in legislative briefing on error-rate drivers for housing-subsidy fraud investigator in a state SNAP agency after an EBT skimming wave. 4. Legislative briefing on error-rate drivers is missing the fact housing-subsidy fraud investigator needs after a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE; stop this Public Benefits close.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Test eligibility, recoupment, and improper-payment facts in legislative briefing on error-rate drivers after a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE. 2. Quantify overpayment if to recoup, waive, or refer is wrong. 3. Separate a case-level error from a program-design failure in a state SNAP agency after an EBT skimming wave. 4. For this Public Benefits Compliance and Integrity Operations file, read legislative briefing on error-rate drivers against a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE and write the one fact that would move to recoup, waive, or refer for housing-subsidy fraud investigator.

RECOMMENDATION Choose To recoup, waive, / Refer for prosecution on this Public Benefits / Compliance and Integrity Operations packet (legislative briefing on error-rate drivers after a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE). The follow-on Compliance and Integrity Operations action is what housing-subsidy fraud investigator does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Public Benefits option on to recoup, waive, or refer, then the evidence in legislative briefing on error-rate drivers, then the action for housing-subsidy fraud investigator - Hypothesis scorecard against legislative briefing on error-rate drivers: supported / rejected / untestable - Compliance and Integrity Operations finding in legislative briefing on error-rate drivers that a second reviewer can re-perform - Missing page in legislative briefing on error-rate drivers after a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE, if any