Assess whether to recoup, waive, or refer for prosecution (118d99)

SITUATION The working file is recoupment aging versus collectability after a hearing officer reversing 40% of trafficking cases. Housing-subsidy fraud investigator in a housing authority with overlapping subsidy households has to name To recoup, waive, or Refer for prosecution for this Public Benefits Recoupment and Policy file.

DECISION Housing-subsidy fraud investigator in a housing authority with overlapping subsidy households must choose To recoup, waive, / Refer for prosecution using recoupment aging versus collectability after a hearing officer reversing 40% of trafficking cases.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Housing-subsidy fraud investigator can defend To recoup, waive, from recoupment aging versus collectability after a hearing officer reversing 40% of trafficking cases in a Public Benefits challenge. 2. Housing-subsidy fraud investigator cannot defend To recoup, waive, from recoupment aging versus collectability; Refer for prosecution is what the extract actually supports after a hearing officer reversing 40% of trafficking cases. 3. A hearing officer reversing 40% of trafficking cases never reached the population in recoupment aging versus collectability — reopen intake, do not close to recoup, waive, or refer. 4. Two facts in recoupment aging versus collectability after a hearing officer reversing 40% of trafficking cases conflict for housing-subsidy fraud investigator; hold this Recoupment and Policy file.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Quantify overpayment if to recoup, waive, or refer is wrong. 2. Separate a case-level error from a program-design failure in a housing authority with overlapping subsidy households. 3. Match household facts in recoupment aging versus collectability to the rule that pays the benefit. 4. For this Public Benefits Recoupment and Policy file, read recoupment aging versus collectability against a hearing officer reversing 40% of trafficking cases and write the one fact that would move to recoup, waive, or refer for housing-subsidy fraud investigator.

RECOMMENDATION Choose To recoup, waive, / Refer for prosecution on this Public Benefits / Recoupment and Policy packet (recoupment aging versus collectability after a hearing officer reversing 40% of trafficking cases). If recoupment aging versus collectability cannot force a Public Benefits label under Recoupment and Policy, stop. If recoupment aging versus collectability after a hearing officer reversing 40% of trafficking cases cannot support To recoup, waive, versus Refer for prosecution on this Public Benefits Recoupment and Policy close, housing-subsidy fraud investigator must do not pay, recoup, or deny beyond the eligibility record.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Public Benefits option on to recoup, waive, or refer, then the evidence in recoupment aging versus collectability, then the action for housing-subsidy fraud investigator - Hypothesis scorecard against recoupment aging versus collectability: supported / rejected / untestable - Missing page in recoupment aging versus collectability after a hearing officer reversing 40% of trafficking cases, if any - Regulatory or exam hook Recoupment and Policy would cite