Assess whether to recoup, waive, or refer for prosecution (1ea8ea)

SITUATION A provider billing full-time care during school hours put recoupment aging versus collectability in front of housing-subsidy fraud investigator in a housing authority with overlapping subsidy households. This Public Benefits / Recoupment and Policy close is to recoup, waive, or refer from recoupment aging versus collectability, and the live options are To recoup, waive,, Refer for prosecution.

DECISION Housing-subsidy fraud investigator in a housing authority with overlapping subsidy households must choose To recoup, waive, / Refer for prosecution using recoupment aging versus collectability after a provider billing full-time care during school hours.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. A provider billing full-time care during school hours is noise around an already-controlled Recoupment and Policy process in a housing authority with overlapping subsidy households, given recoupment aging versus collectability. 2. A provider billing full-time care during school hours is the event in recoupment aging versus collectability that forces To recoup, waive, for housing-subsidy fraud investigator under Public Benefits. 3. Recoupment aging versus collectability shows a one-file miss after a provider billing full-time care during school hours, not a Recoupment and Policy program failure. 4. Recoupment aging versus collectability cannot decide to recoup, waive, or refer yet after a provider billing full-time care during school hours; hold is the only Public Benefits close a housing authority with overlapping subsidy households can defend.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Quantify overpayment if to recoup, waive, or refer is wrong. 2. Separate a case-level error from a program-design failure in a housing authority with overlapping subsidy households. 3. Match household facts in recoupment aging versus collectability to the rule that pays the benefit. 4. For this Public Benefits Recoupment and Policy file, read recoupment aging versus collectability against a provider billing full-time care during school hours and write the one fact that would move to recoup, waive, or refer for housing-subsidy fraud investigator.

RECOMMENDATION Choose To recoup, waive, / Refer for prosecution on this Public Benefits / Recoupment and Policy packet (recoupment aging versus collectability after a provider billing full-time care during school hours). The follow-on Recoupment and Policy action is what housing-subsidy fraud investigator does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Public Benefits option on to recoup, waive, or refer, then the evidence in recoupment aging versus collectability, then the action for housing-subsidy fraud investigator - Hypothesis scorecard against recoupment aging versus collectability: supported / rejected / untestable - Named option among To recoup, waive,, Refer for prosecution and the fact that kills the others - Owner and next date for housing-subsidy fraud investigator in a housing authority with overlapping subsidy households