Assess whether to recoup, waive, or refer for prosecution (eeb633)

SITUATION Housing-subsidy fraud investigator in a housing authority with overlapping subsidy households has one working extract — retailer trafficking red-flag report — after a skimming complaint cluster around one terminal. If retailer trafficking red-flag report cannot support to recoup, waive, or refer, the only defensible Public Benefits output is hold.

DECISION Housing-subsidy fraud investigator in a housing authority with overlapping subsidy households must choose To recoup, waive, / Refer for prosecution using retailer trafficking red-flag report after a skimming complaint cluster around one terminal.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. The population in retailer trafficking red-flag report is the one a skimming complaint cluster around one terminal named, so To recoup, waive, follows for this Recoupment and Policy file. 2. The population in retailer trafficking red-flag report is adjacent only to a skimming complaint cluster around one terminal; Refer for prosecution is the honest Public Benefits call. 3. A housing authority with overlapping subsidy households already contained a skimming complaint cluster around one terminal before retailer trafficking red-flag report arrived; no new Recoupment and Policy path. 4. Provenance on retailer trafficking red-flag report after a skimming complaint cluster around one terminal is broken; do not pick To recoup, waive, or Refer for prosecution yet.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Quantify overpayment if to recoup, waive, or refer is wrong. 2. Separate a case-level error from a program-design failure in a housing authority with overlapping subsidy households. 3. Match household facts in retailer trafficking red-flag report to the rule that pays the benefit. 4. For this Public Benefits Recoupment and Policy file, read retailer trafficking red-flag report against a skimming complaint cluster around one terminal and write the one fact that would move to recoup, waive, or refer for housing-subsidy fraud investigator.

RECOMMENDATION Choose To recoup, waive, / Refer for prosecution on this Public Benefits / Recoupment and Policy packet (retailer trafficking red-flag report after a skimming complaint cluster around one terminal). Lead with the Public Benefits option retailer trafficking red-flag report can support after a skimming complaint cluster around one terminal, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for housing-subsidy fraud investigator in a housing authority with overlapping subsidy households.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Public Benefits option on to recoup, waive, or refer, then the evidence in retailer trafficking red-flag report, then the action for housing-subsidy fraud investigator - Hypothesis scorecard against retailer trafficking red-flag report: supported / rejected / untestable - Regulatory or exam hook Recoupment and Policy would cite - Recoupment and Policy finding in retailer trafficking red-flag report that a second reviewer can re-perform