Assess whether a top customer is actually sticky (c76c4f)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
Separation and Integration work in a strategic buyer looking at a carve-out from a conglomerate now turns on a top customer is actually sticky because a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist put earnout metric definitions that invite dispute in play. Customer-contract risk reviewer should say what earnout metric definitions that invite dispute proves.
Decision
Customer-contract risk reviewer in a strategic buyer looking at a carve-out from a conglomerate must choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold using earnout metric definitions that invite dispute after a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist.
Hypotheses to test
- Customer-contract risk reviewer can defend Proceed from earnout metric definitions that invite dispute after a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist in a M&A Due Diligence challenge.
- Customer-contract risk reviewer cannot defend Proceed from earnout metric definitions that invite dispute; Reprice is what the extract actually supports after a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist.
- A TSA that expires before replacement systems exist never reached the population in earnout metric definitions that invite dispute — reopen intake, do not close a top customer is actually sticky.
- Two facts in earnout metric definitions that invite dispute after a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist conflict for customer-contract risk reviewer; hold this Separation and Integration file.
Analysis required
- Test whether a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist is a diligence gap, a price chip, or a walk-away.
- Separate a one-off add-back from a recurring earnings issue in earnout metric definitions that invite dispute.
- Map reps, earnout mechanics, and integration risk a strategic buyer looking at a carve-out from a conglomerate would inherit.
- For this M&A Due Diligence Separation and Integration file, read earnout metric definitions that invite dispute against a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist and write the one fact that would move a top customer is actually sticky for customer-contract risk reviewer.
Recommendation
Choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold on this M&A Due Diligence / Separation and Integration packet (earnout metric definitions that invite dispute after a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist). The follow-on Separation and Integration action is what customer-contract risk reviewer does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.
Explore more
More M&A Due Diligence prompts
- Assess whether the carve-out is operable on day one (49f217)
- Assess whether the carve-out is operable on day one (2eca8c)
- Assess whether environmental liability is capped or open-ended (e58b46)
- Assess whether to re-trade, restructure, or drop (106e8e)
- Assess whether related-party sales should be backed out of valuation (f1d7ff)
Explore related decision areas
- Assess whether inventory exists or is only on paper (0dea85)Forensic Accounting
- Assess whether a modification is in-scope or a new procurement (fe0064)Government RFP
- Assess whether CAT pricing is defensible given SOV quality (9dce6b)Insurance Underwriting
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

