Assess whether a top customer is actually sticky (c97a4c)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
Separation and Integration work in a public acquirer facing HSR and sector regulators now turns on a top customer is actually sticky because a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist put management-team retention and key-person map in play. Separation and Integration work in a public acquirer facing HSR and sector regulators now turns on a top customer is actually sticky because a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist put management-team retention and key-person map in play; commercial-diligence partner should say what management-team retention and key-person map proves for M&A Due Diligence.
Decision
Commercial-diligence partner in a public acquirer facing HSR and sector regulators must choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold using management-team retention and key-person map after a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist.
Hypotheses to test
- Commercial-diligence partner can defend Proceed from management-team retention and key-person map after a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist in a M&A Due Diligence challenge.
- Commercial-diligence partner cannot defend Proceed from management-team retention and key-person map; Reprice is what the extract actually supports after a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist.
- A TSA that expires before replacement systems exist never reached the population in management-team retention and key-person map — reopen intake, do not close a top customer is actually sticky.
- Two facts in management-team retention and key-person map after a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist conflict for commercial-diligence partner; hold this Separation and Integration file.
Analysis required
- Test whether a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist is a diligence gap, a price chip, or a walk-away.
- Separate a one-off add-back from a recurring earnings issue in management-team retention and key-person map.
- Map reps, earnout mechanics, and integration risk a public acquirer facing HSR and sector regulators would inherit.
- For this M&A Due Diligence Separation and Integration file, read management-team retention and key-person map against a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist and write the one fact that would move a top customer is actually sticky for commercial-diligence partner.
Explore more
More M&A Due Diligence prompts
- Assess whether earnings quality supports the bid price (59506e)
- Assess whether earnout definitions will cause a post-close fight (71678c)
- Assess whether related-party sales should be backed out of valuation (5b8807)
- Assess whether earnings quality supports the bid price (239060)
- Assess whether management can run this without the founder (107061)
Explore related decision areas
- Assess whether to bid as prime, sub, or no-bid after a debrief thatGovernment RFP
- Assess whether a vendor is a disguised related party from round-trip cashForensic Accounting
- Assess whether product recall exposure is priced or excluded (bb1f80)Insurance Underwriting
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

