Assess whether a top customer is actually sticky after a Phase II that found
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
Related-party revenue that disappears at close arrived with a Phase II that found groundwater impact for working-capital true-up analyst. That is a M&A Due Diligence People and Contracts decision on a top customer is actually sticky in a family-office reviewing a manufacturing target.
Decision
Working-capital true-up analyst in a family-office reviewing a manufacturing target must choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold using related-party revenue that disappears at close after a Phase II that found groundwater impact.
Hypotheses to test
- Working-capital true-up analyst can defend Proceed from related-party revenue that disappears at close after a Phase II that found groundwater impact in a M&A Due Diligence challenge.
- Working-capital true-up analyst cannot defend Proceed from related-party revenue that disappears at close; Reprice is what the extract actually supports after a Phase II that found groundwater impact.
- A Phase II that found groundwater impact never reached the population in related-party revenue that disappears at close — reopen intake, do not close a top customer is actually sticky.
- Two facts in related-party revenue that disappears at close after a Phase II that found groundwater impact conflict for working-capital true-up analyst; hold this People and Contracts file.
Analysis required
- Tie quality-of-earnings, working-capital, and contingent items in related-party revenue that disappears at close to a top customer is actually sticky.
- Name the document working-capital true-up analyst still needs before signing.
- Test whether a Phase II that found groundwater impact is a diligence gap, a price chip, or a walk-away.
- For this M&A Due Diligence People and Contracts file, read related-party revenue that disappears at close against a Phase II that found groundwater impact and write the one fact that would move a top customer is actually sticky for working-capital true-up analyst.
Recommendation
Choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold on this M&A Due Diligence / People and Contracts packet (related-party revenue that disappears at close after a Phase II that found groundwater impact). The follow-on People and Contracts action is what working-capital true-up analyst does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.
Explore more
More M&A Due Diligence prompts
- Assess whether integration costs were sandbagged in the CIM (564e21)
- Assess whether to re-trade, restructure, or drop (db0dd0)
- Assess whether earnings quality supports the bid price (d79852)
- Assess whether earnout definitions will cause a post-close fight (be4375)
- Whether management can run this without the founder from related-party
Explore related decision areas
- Assess whether to price to win or walk from a buy-in after a modificationGovernment RFP
- Assess whether cyber controls claimed are actually in force (572ab0)Insurance Underwriting
- Assess whether the S-1 disclosure language is still defensible (bfc65e)Forensic Accounting
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

