Whether a top customer is actually sticky from working-capital peg versus
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
A strategic buyer looking at a carve-out from a conglomerate cannot treat a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist as color commentary on working-capital peg versus seasonal reality. IP diligence counsel's financial counterpart must close a top customer is actually sticky from that extract under M&A Due Diligence / Earnings and Revenue Quality.
Decision
IP diligence counsel's financial counterpart in a strategic buyer looking at a carve-out from a conglomerate must choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold using working-capital peg versus seasonal reality after a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist.
Hypotheses to test
- The population in working-capital peg versus seasonal reality is the one a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist named, so Proceed follows for this Earnings and Revenue Quality file.
- The population in working-capital peg versus seasonal reality is adjacent only to a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist; Reprice is the honest M&A Due Diligence call.
- A strategic buyer looking at a carve-out from a conglomerate already contained a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist before working-capital peg versus seasonal reality arrived; no new Earnings and Revenue Quality path.
- Provenance on working-capital peg versus seasonal reality after a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist is broken; do not pick Proceed or Reprice yet.
Analysis required
- Name the document IP diligence counsel's financial counterpart still needs before signing.
- Test whether a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist is a diligence gap, a price chip, or a walk-away.
- Separate a one-off add-back from a recurring earnings issue in working-capital peg versus seasonal reality.
- For this M&A Due Diligence Earnings and Revenue Quality file, read working-capital peg versus seasonal reality against a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist and write the one fact that would move a top customer is actually sticky for IP diligence counsel's financial counterpart.
Recommendation
Choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold on this M&A Due Diligence / Earnings and Revenue Quality packet (working-capital peg versus seasonal reality after a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist). The follow-on Earnings and Revenue Quality action is what IP diligence counsel's financial counterpart does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.
Explore more
More M&A Due Diligence prompts
- Assess whether earnout definitions will cause a post-close fight after an HSR
- Assess whether environmental liability is capped or open-ended after a peg
- Commercial-diligence partner must resolve whether IP is owned or merely
- Carve-out separation lead must resolve whether earnings quality supports
- Assess whether to re-trade, restructure, or drop from customer concentration
Explore related decision areas
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

