Assess whether a trial site should be referred (6cae9b)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
Clinical-trial site anomaly report arrived with an AI RFP that treats accuracy as the only evaluation factor for IG improper-payments investigator. That is a US Federal AI Governance Vendor Risk decision on a trial site should be referred in an IG shop scoping a whistleblower allegation.
Decision
IG improper-payments investigator in an IG shop scoping a whistleblower allegation must choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid using clinical-trial site anomaly report after an AI RFP that treats accuracy as the only evaluation factor.
Hypotheses to test
- An AI RFP that treats accuracy as the only evaluation factor is noise around an already-controlled AI Governance Vendor Risk process in an IG shop scoping a whistleblower allegation, given clinical-trial site anomaly report.
- An AI RFP that treats accuracy as the only evaluation factor is the event in clinical-trial site anomaly report that forces Pursue for IG improper-payments investigator under US Federal.
- Clinical-trial site anomaly report shows a one-file miss after an AI RFP that treats accuracy as the only evaluation factor, not a AI Governance Vendor Risk program failure.
- Clinical-trial site anomaly report cannot decide a trial site should be referred yet after an AI RFP that treats accuracy as the only evaluation factor; hold is the only US Federal close an IG shop scoping a whistleblower allegation can defend.
Analysis required
- Map FAR, Section L/M, and evaluator priorities in clinical-trial site anomaly report after an AI RFP that treats accuracy as the only evaluation factor.
- Name the evaluation right IG improper-payments investigator would forfeit by rushing.
- Normalize pricing and CPARS/QASP evidence that actually supports a trial site should be referred.
- For this US Federal AI Governance Vendor Risk file, read clinical-trial site anomaly report against an AI RFP that treats accuracy as the only evaluation factor and write the one fact that would move a trial site should be referred for IG improper-payments investigator.
Recommendation
Choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid on this US Federal / AI Governance Vendor Risk packet (clinical-trial site anomaly report after an AI RFP that treats accuracy as the only evaluation factor). The follow-on AI Governance Vendor Risk action is what IG improper-payments investigator does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.
Explore more
More US Federal prompts
- Assess whether threshold splitting is a procurement-integrity issue (c3f180)
- Assess whether comparative files show discrimination the bank must own
- Assess whether comparative files show discrimination the bank must own
- Assess whether an OFAC match is true and requires blocking (dfbc1e)
- Assess whether a trial site should be referred (24374f)
Explore related decision areas
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

