Assess whether unpriced actions should be stopped (e3176b)

SITUATION After UCAs older than the local policy cap, scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN is the working evidence for NSN research lead in a depot whose parts master does not match DLA. Decide whether unpriced actions should be stopped using only what scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN actually supports.

DECISION NSN research lead in a depot whose parts master does not match DLA must choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold using scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN after UCAs older than the local policy cap.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. UCAs older than the local policy cap is noise around an already-controlled Depot Procurement Intelligence process in a depot whose parts master does not match DLA, given scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN. 2. UCAs older than the local policy cap is the event in scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN that forces Fund and move materiel for NSN research lead under Defense Sustainment. 3. Scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN shows a one-file miss after UCAs older than the local policy cap, not a Depot Procurement Intelligence program failure. 4. Scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN cannot decide unpriced actions should be stopped yet after UCAs older than the local policy cap; hold is the only Defense Sustainment close a depot whose parts master does not match DLA can defend.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Test whether the shortfall is materiel, maintenance posting, or a bad count. 2. Compare on-hand, due-in, and condemned quantities in scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN. 3. Quantify mission impact if unpriced actions should be stopped is deferred one cycle in a depot whose parts master does not match DLA. 4. For this Defense Sustainment Depot Procurement Intelligence file, read scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN against UCAs older than the local policy cap and write the one fact that would move unpriced actions should be stopped for NSN research lead.

RECOMMENDATION From scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN after UCAs older than the local policy cap, choose Fund and move materiel when scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN itself shows the discriminator for unpriced actions should be stopped. NSN research lead in a depot whose parts master does not match DLA should implement that path on this Defense Sustainment Depot Procurement Intelligence file and name the two facts in scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN that force it. If scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN after UCAs older than the local policy cap cannot support Fund and move materiel versus Cannibalize or substitute, NSN research lead must do not move materiel or funding on a count the depot file cannot reconstruct.