Assess whether unpriced actions should be stopped (d02254)

SITUATION Unpriced contractual action aging list arrived with UCAs older than the local policy cap for Hill AF logistics data reviewer. That is a Defense Sustainment Depot Procurement Intelligence decision on unpriced actions should be stopped in a program office facing a diminishing-manufacturing source.

DECISION Hill AF logistics data reviewer in a program office facing a diminishing-manufacturing source must choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold using unpriced contractual action aging list after UCAs older than the local policy cap.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. UCAs older than the local policy cap is noise around an already-controlled Depot Procurement Intelligence process in a program office facing a diminishing-manufacturing source, given unpriced contractual action aging list. 2. UCAs older than the local policy cap is the event in unpriced contractual action aging list that forces Fund and move materiel for Hill AF logistics data reviewer under Defense Sustainment. 3. Unpriced contractual action aging list shows a one-file miss after UCAs older than the local policy cap, not a Depot Procurement Intelligence program failure. 4. Unpriced contractual action aging list cannot decide unpriced actions should be stopped yet after UCAs older than the local policy cap; hold is the only Defense Sustainment close a program office facing a diminishing-manufacturing source can defend.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Trace the funding or cannibalization line that would actually move unpriced contractual action aging list. 2. Test whether the shortfall is materiel, maintenance posting, or a bad count. 3. Compare on-hand, due-in, and condemned quantities in unpriced contractual action aging list. 4. For this Defense Sustainment Depot Procurement Intelligence file, read unpriced contractual action aging list against UCAs older than the local policy cap and write the one fact that would move unpriced actions should be stopped for Hill AF logistics data reviewer.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold on this Defense Sustainment / Depot Procurement Intelligence packet (unpriced contractual action aging list after UCAs older than the local policy cap). If unpriced contractual action aging list cannot force a Defense Sustainment label under Depot Procurement Intelligence, stop. Do not invent missing evidence a program office facing a diminishing-manufacturing source does not have.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Defense Sustainment option on unpriced actions should be stopped, then the evidence in unpriced contractual action aging list, then the action for Hill AF logistics data reviewer - Hypothesis scorecard against unpriced contractual action aging list: supported / rejected / untestable - Missing page in unpriced contractual action aging list after UCAs older than the local policy cap, if any - Regulatory or exam hook Depot Procurement Intelligence would cite