Board AI liaison must resolve whether the vendor can be used in a regulated
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
A near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed put EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet in front of board AI liaison in a manufacturer piloting shop-floor copilot tools. This AI Governance / Inventory and Regulatory Fit close is the vendor can be from EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet, and the live options are Policy or governance breach, Model defect, Dual failure.
Decision
Board AI liaison in a manufacturer piloting shop-floor copilot tools must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed.
Hypotheses to test
- Authorize Policy or governance breach now; EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet already has the discriminator after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed.
- Keep Model defect in force until EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet is completed after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed for board AI liaison.
- Treat EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet as Dual failure because both readings appear after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed.
- Refuse a AI Governance close: board AI liaison does not have the page the vendor can be turns on in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet.
Analysis required
- Walk the model input/output path recorded in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged.
- Verify data provenance and the human-oversight gate board AI liaison can actually point to.
- Walk the model input/output path recorded in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged.
- For this AI Governance Inventory and Regulatory Fit file, read EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet against a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed and write the one fact that would move the vendor can be for board AI liaison.
Recommendation
Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Inventory and Regulatory Fit packet (EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed). If EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet cannot force a AI Governance label under Inventory and Regulatory Fit, stop. Do not invent pages a manufacturer piloting shop-floor copilot tools does not have.
Explore more
More AI Governance prompts
- Whether the system is high-risk under the EU AI Act from explainability pack
- Assess whether a shadow system must be decommissioned this quarter (e23136)
- Whether human review is real or a rubber stamp from agentic-workflow
- Chief AI officer must resolve whether a generative-AI incident is a policy
- Assess whether explainability artifacts would survive an exam (ff79c5)
Explore related decision areas
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

