Assess whether the vendor can be used in a regulated process (25e4ab)

SITUATION A new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose put shadow-IT chatbot connected to customer PII in front of exam-readiness coordinator in a university licensing an AI proctoring vendor. This AI Governance / Vendors and Agentic Systems decision is the vendor can be from shadow-IT chatbot connected to customer PII, and the live options are Policy or governance breach, Model defect, Dual failure.

DECISION Exam-readiness coordinator in a university licensing an AI proctoring vendor must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using shadow-IT chatbot connected to customer PII after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Shadow-IT chatbot connected to customer PII reads as Policy or governance breach once a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose is lined up to the same AI Governance population. 2. Shadow-IT chatbot connected to customer PII is closer to Model defect after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose; Policy or governance breach would over-claim this Vendors and Agentic Systems extract. 3. Dual failure is still live in shadow-IT chatbot connected to customer PII for exam-readiness coordinator in a university licensing an AI proctoring vendor. 4. Shadow-IT chatbot connected to customer PII is missing the fact exam-readiness coordinator needs after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose; stop this AI Governance close.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Walk the model input/output path recorded in shadow-IT chatbot connected to customer PII and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged. 2. Verify data provenance and the human-oversight gate exam-readiness coordinator can actually point to. 3. Walk the model input/output path recorded in shadow-IT chatbot connected to customer PII and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged. 4. For this AI Governance Vendors and Agentic Systems file, read shadow-IT chatbot connected to customer PII against a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose and write the one fact that would move the vendor can be for exam-readiness coordinator.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Vendors and Agentic Systems packet (shadow-IT chatbot connected to customer PII after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose). Lead with the AI Governance option shadow-IT chatbot connected to customer PII can support after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for exam-readiness coordinator in a university licensing an AI proctoring vendor.