Assess whether vendor terms allow customer data in training (8abb4a)

SITUATION After a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted, reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality is what enterprise AI control-plane owner can touch in a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights. AI Governance Layer will live with Policy or governance breach versus Model defect on this Audit and Vendor Terms file.

DECISION Enterprise AI control-plane owner in a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Policy or governance breach now; reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality already has the discriminator after a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted. 2. Keep Model defect in force until reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality is completed after a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted for enterprise AI control-plane owner. 3. Treat reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality as Dual failure because both readings appear after a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted. 4. Refuse a AI Governance Layer close: enterprise AI control-plane owner does not have the decision vendor terms allow customer turns on in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Test whether a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 2. Score whether the agent action in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 3. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file, read reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality against a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted and write the one fact that would move vendor terms allow customer for enterprise AI control-plane owner.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Audit and Vendor Terms packet (reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted). The follow-on Audit and Vendor Terms action is what enterprise AI control-plane owner does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.