Assess whether vendor terms allow customer data in training (8de75f)

SITUATION A manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA cannot treat a committee that has not met since the last incident as incidental context on reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality. Vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner must close vendor terms allow customer from that extract under AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability.

DECISION Vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after a committee that has not met since the last incident.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. The population in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality is the one a committee that has not met since the last incident named, so Policy or governance breach follows for this Lifecycle and Accountability file. 2. The population in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality is adjacent only to a committee that has not met since the last incident; Model defect is the honest AI Governance Layer call. 3. A manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA already contained a committee that has not met since the last incident before reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality arrived; no new Lifecycle and Accountability path. 4. Provenance on reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after a committee that has not met since the last incident is broken; do not pick Policy or governance breach or Model defect yet.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA. 2. Map the control-plane score in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality to the policy gate vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner can enforce. 3. Name the override that would let vendor terms allow customer proceed without a silent bypass. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality against a committee that has not met since the last incident and write the one fact that would move vendor terms allow customer for vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after a committee that has not met since the last incident). The follow-on Lifecycle and Accountability action is what vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.