Assess whether work-requirement hours are documentable (355d15)

SITUATION UI identity-fraud caseworker in a UI shop after a synthetic-identity filing spike has one working extract — identity-proofing exception queue — after a MAGI mismatch that could be a household-size coding error. If identity-proofing exception queue cannot support work-requirement hours are documentable, the only defensible Public Benefits output is hold.

DECISION UI identity-fraud caseworker in a UI shop after a synthetic-identity filing spike must choose Pay or continue / Recoup / Deny / Hold using identity-proofing exception queue after a MAGI mismatch that could be a household-size coding error.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. The population in identity-proofing exception queue is the one a MAGI mismatch that could be a household-size coding error named, so Pay or continue follows for this Recoupment and Policy file. 2. The population in identity-proofing exception queue is adjacent only to a MAGI mismatch that could be a household-size coding error; Recoup is the honest Public Benefits call. 3. A UI shop after a synthetic-identity filing spike already contained a MAGI mismatch that could be a household-size coding error before identity-proofing exception queue arrived; no new Recoupment and Policy path. 4. Provenance on identity-proofing exception queue after a MAGI mismatch that could be a household-size coding error is broken; do not pick Pay or continue or Recoup yet.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Quantify overpayment if work-requirement hours are documentable is wrong. 2. Separate a case-level error from a program-design failure in a UI shop after a synthetic-identity filing spike. 3. Match household facts in identity-proofing exception queue to the rule that pays the benefit. 4. For this Public Benefits Recoupment and Policy file, read identity-proofing exception queue against a MAGI mismatch that could be a household-size coding error and write the one fact that would move work-requirement hours are documentable for UI identity-fraud caseworker.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Pay or continue / Recoup / Deny / Hold on this Public Benefits / Recoupment and Policy packet (identity-proofing exception queue after a MAGI mismatch that could be a household-size coding error). If identity-proofing exception queue cannot force a Public Benefits label under Recoupment and Policy, stop. Do not invent missing evidence a UI shop after a synthetic-identity filing spike does not have.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Public Benefits option on work-requirement hours are documentable, then the evidence in identity-proofing exception queue, then the action for UI identity-fraud caseworker - Hypothesis scorecard against identity-proofing exception queue: supported / rejected / untestable - Named option among Pay or continue, Recoup, Deny and the fact that kills the others - Owner and next date for UI identity-fraud caseworker in a UI shop after a synthetic-identity filing spike