Assess whether procurement should fail a vendor lacking eval rights (494ed4)

SITUATION Output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output arrived with a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable'. AI committee secretariat in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy still has an evidence gap on whether procurement should fail a vendor lacking eval rights.

DECISION AI committee secretariat in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable'.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Policy or governance breach now; output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output already has the discriminator after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable'. 2. Keep Model defect in force until output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output is completed after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable' for AI committee secretariat. 3. Treat output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output as Dual failure because both readings appear after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable'. 4. Refuse a AI Governance Layer close: AI committee secretariat does not have the decision procurement should fail a turns on in output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Test whether a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable' changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 2. Score whether the agent action in output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 3. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output against a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable' and write the one fact that would move procurement should fail a for AI committee secretariat.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable'). Lead with the AI Governance Layer option output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output can support after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable', then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for AI committee secretariat in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy.