Assess whether training data has a lawful basis and documented lineage

SITUATION A board deck that called the system 'fully explainable' put post-deployment drift report the owner never signed in front of board AI liaison in a retailer using generative AI in customer service. This AI Governance / Policy and Oversight close is training data has a from post-deployment drift report the owner never signed, and the live options are Policy or governance breach, Model defect, Dual failure.

DECISION Board AI liaison in a retailer using generative AI in customer service must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using post-deployment drift report the owner never signed after a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable'.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Post-deployment drift report the owner never signed reads as Policy or governance breach once a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable' is lined up to the same AI Governance population. 2. Post-deployment drift report the owner never signed is closer to Model defect after a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable'; Policy or governance breach would over-claim this Policy and Oversight extract. 3. Dual failure is still live in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed for board AI liaison in a retailer using generative AI in customer service. 4. Post-deployment drift report the owner never signed is missing the fact board AI liaison needs after a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable'; stop this AI Governance close.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Check intended purpose and inventory status against EU AI Act / exam-readiness language after a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable'. 2. Map the approved-use case to the system training data has a would bind. 3. Check intended purpose and inventory status against EU AI Act / exam-readiness language after a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable'. 4. For this AI Governance Policy and Oversight file, read post-deployment drift report the owner never signed against a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable' and write the one fact that would move training data has a for board AI liaison.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Policy and Oversight packet (post-deployment drift report the owner never signed after a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable'). Lead with the AI Governance option post-deployment drift report the owner never signed can support after a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable', then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for board AI liaison in a retailer using generative AI in customer service.