Assess whether comparative files show second-review bias (3ecc43)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
Mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group arrived with a CRA PE that called the assessment area too narrow for community-development lender. That is a Fair Lending CRA and Special-Purpose Programs decision on comparative files show second-review in an institution preparing for a redlining exam.
Decision
Community-development lender in an institution preparing for a redlining exam must choose Remove access or reverse the item / Temporary compensating control / Approve a documented exception / Hold using mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group after a CRA PE that called the assessment area too narrow.
Hypotheses to test
- The population in mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group is the one a CRA PE that called the assessment area too narrow named, so Remove access or reverse the item follows for this CRA and Special-Purpose Programs file.
- The population in mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group is adjacent only to a CRA PE that called the assessment area too narrow; Temporary compensating control is the honest Fair Lending call.
- An institution preparing for a redlining exam already contained a CRA PE that called the assessment area too narrow before mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group arrived; no new CRA and Special-Purpose Programs path.
- Provenance on mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group after a CRA PE that called the assessment area too narrow is broken; do not pick Remove access or reverse the item or Temporary compensating control yet.
Analysis required
- Flag any disparate-impact table community-development lender cannot explain from mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group.
- Test a documented exception versus a pattern an institution preparing for a redlining exam must defend.
- Match the adverse-action language to the facts in mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group.
- For this Fair Lending CRA and Special-Purpose Programs file, read mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group against a CRA PE that called the assessment area too narrow and write the one fact that would move comparative files show second-review for community-development lender.
Recommendation
Choose Remove access or reverse the item / Temporary compensating control / Approve a documented exception / Hold on this Fair Lending / CRA and Special-Purpose Programs packet (mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group after a CRA PE that called the assessment area too narrow). Lead with the Fair Lending option mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group can support after a CRA PE that called the assessment area too narrow, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for community-development lender in an institution preparing for a redlining exam.
Explore more
More Fair Lending prompts
- Assess whether dealer overlays introduce prohibited steering (d754ec)
- Assess whether a special-purpose program is well designed or a pretext
- Assess whether to pause a product pending a lookback (5376f1)
- Assess whether the exam response should concede a finding (4e2305)
- Assess whether the CRA plan is strategy or window dressing (ba6884)
Explore related decision areas
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

