Assess whether past performance will score or be deemed not relevant (495fee)

Situation

In an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance, teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes is the evidence after a task order that looks written for one vendor. Contracts officer supporting a bid has to pick Past performance will score or Be deemed not relevant for this Government RFP Capture and Pricing close using teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes.

Decision

Contracts officer supporting a bid in an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance must choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant using teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes after a task order that looks written for one vendor.

Hypotheses to test

• Authorize Past performance will score now; teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes already has the discriminator after a task order that looks written for one vendor.
• Keep Be deemed not relevant in force until teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes is completed after a task order that looks written for one vendor for contracts officer supporting a bid.
• Treat teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes as Past performance will score because both readings appear after a task order that looks written for one vendor.
• Refuse a Government RFP close: contracts officer supporting a bid does not have the page past performance will score turns on in teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes.

Analysis required

• Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes attaches.
• Normalize pricing and exceptions against the solicitation that governs past performance will score.
• Score competitive posture if contracts officer supporting a bid pursues, partners, or no-bids.
• For this Government RFP Capture and Pricing file, read teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes against a task order that looks written for one vendor and write the one fact that would move past performance will score for contracts officer supporting a bid.

Recommendation

Choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant on this Government RFP / Capture and Pricing packet (teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes after a task order that looks written for one vendor). If teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes cannot force a Government RFP label under Capture and Pricing, stop. If teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes after a task order that looks written for one vendor cannot support Past performance will score versus Be deemed not relevant on this Government RFP Capture and Pricing close, contracts officer supporting a bid must identify the Section L/M or evaluation criterion that remains unproven rather than filling the gap.